Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Monday, July 30, 2018

Ben Swift Band-Chimpanzee (1998)

(Illustration, Design, and Photography by Abbey Tyson)

There are a lot of reviews out there comparing the Ben Swift Band to the Dave Matthews Band, or at least lumping them into the "90's jam band" category. One Amazon customer reviewer (whom I will refrain from naming for their own safety) said something to the effect of "these guys basically do what Dave Matthews does, but better". In my opinion, the last way to win over a Dave Matthews Band (or "DMB" from here on in) fan is to suggest that there is someone else out there who "does it better"; his fans are pretty hardcore--like, "Deadhead" hardcore. If you openly suggested to a DMB fan that there was a similar group that "did it better" you would be put into a crate and shipped to a remote island where man is hunted for sport; and while the denizens of this island polished and mounted the heads from that day's hunt, they would debate, ad nauseum, what the best live version of "Two Step" is.

But let's be clear-the Ben Swift Band are NOT a DMB copy. Any similarities lie in the strengths of the respective bands/ performers, not via any attempt by the former to ape the latter. Those similarities include:
-Ben Swift's vocals are a formidable weapon-raspy and soulful, yet tuneful. So, like Dave Matthews, he is one of those rare "jam band" front-men whose voice is among the most potent things on show.
-They are song oriented. The jamming is incidental to the song-not the other way around.
-Brass instruments and mandolins pop up now and again.

Unlike many so-called "jam bands", there is a remarkable and refreshing concision to "Chimpanzee". The longest song on the album is the title track, which weighs in at a robust, but not overdone 5:54. What's more, the virtuoso qualities, limberness, and looseness of the songs actually feel magnified by the shorter running times. Why stretch it out just for the sake of it? If you can take someone on a fulfilling and inspired journey in 4 minutes when it takes your contemporaries 10 or more to communicate less, then why not do it?

My favourite tracks on the album are the slinky and sexy "Cup and Saucer":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaalkOhvGDM
the swinging and stirring "Poughkeepsie":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oj-75l3DU4
and the seraphic and subdued "Walking Away":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9xMbngPKFk

Ben Swift's music can (and should) be purchased on iTunes and/or CDbaby:
https://store.cdbaby.com/Artist/BenSwiftBand

(Art credits same as above; Label info: Stonebone Records)

Tuesday, July 24, 2018

Brendan Benson-One Mississippi (1996)

(Photos by Jennifer Youngblood, Tom LeGoff, and Dan Burkhart; Design by Jeff Lyons)
Brendan Benson is a pretty important name in 90's power pop circles (right up there with Matthew Sweet), and he would go on to co-star with Jack White in The Raconteurs (known for hits like "Steady As She Goes"). Regardless, this--his first album-- is often unfairly overlooked, and can be a bit tricky to find. 

For a songwriter making his first foray into major label territory (the album was released on Virgin), Benson shows oodles and oodles of confidence. Take for example "Sittin' Pretty", easily the most musically accessible and catchy track on the album. So, you have a radio-ready hit; lightning in a bottle; this track is gonna break you into the mainstream...so what's it about?

Well, metaphorically, it seems to be about a person who has complete dominion over a relationship- a one-sided romance. Read literally it's about sexual violence, obsession, kidnapping, stalking...it's pretty dark! It includes lyrics like: "If I point my gun at you, are you gonna see it my way?" and a chorus of:
"My baby's tied to a chair
Don't she look pretty, just sittin' there?"


Ya know-lyrics that wouldn't sound out of place on an Alice Cooper album. Was Benson ever worried about people conflating the roles of writer and narrator? Label backlash?

It's really quite unique: musically, a super sweet, super catchy power pop gem....but one to listen to through gritted teeth.
(Benson co-wrote the song with Jellyfish's Jason Falkner, so maybe having that veteran presence was a calming influence).

The rest of the album features more of the catchy, brash, and timeless pop Benson is known for-but with a bit more roughness than the follow-up: 2002's "Lapalco".

Sittin' Pretty:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqGCyhnUhjA
Insects Rule:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AITAmMZ-ZV0


(Label info reads: Virgin Music Canada; Distributed by EMI)




(Credits same as for album cover)

Monday, July 23, 2018

Floater-Angels in the Flesh & the Devil in the Bone (1998)

(Concept by Floater; Graphic Manip. by Paul Anders; Manip/Layout by Rabid Rabit Graphics)
The eye imagery surrounding this American progressive rock group (including the eye on the album cover here) leads me to believe that they are named for the squiggly little shapes you get in your field of vision from deposits in your vitreous humour. It's also an apt description of how their albums play--allowing the listener to float between various liminal and transitory states (am I a fly on the wall in someone's dream? Is the narrator on a plane somewhere between life and death?) It's almost like a musical version of that hypnotic and unsettling diner scene in David Lynch's "Mulholland Drive" in which a man recounts a disturbing dream to his companion...and then it starts to seep into reality (or is it reality?)... I will refrain from posting spoilers (look it up on youtube). The whole scene plays like a dream in and of itself...and then you get the "dream within the dream"-and it's all very captivating and unnerving and artfully done and blah blah blah you get the idea.

Floater are, like many of their influences (Pink Floyd being a huge one I would think) interested not only in evoking transitory states, but exploring artifice (particularly cinematic artifice-see "American Cinema") and idolatry (just look at the title of this one and you'll get the idea) as well. From what I can gather based on my listens, it seems to be a loose concept album based on a Christ-like figure (or one with delusions of godliness) experiencing a real or imagined death and rebirth (Wikipedia seems to confirm this). I will note, however, that nothing about the concept is on-the-nose or lazy. Skillful writing ensures that the songs retain a sense of mystique-even a sense of the cabalistic; so repeat listens are welcomed. In fact, I would go as far as to say that this may have been the kind of dark magic King Crimson were trying to capture during their 90's/ early 2000's comeback.

Floater seem to get lumped into the alt-metal file from time to time (their earlier albums, like 1994's "Sink" certainly have a harder edge), but that was never a comfortable label. Later albums, like 2004's "Acoustics" had a bit of a latter day Pink Floyd sound (particularly Gilmour's Floyd); maybe even a bit of Alan Parsons at his darkest. "Angels..." is at the mid-point of this transition.     

Endless II:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYhqWYPZfBw
Medicine Woman:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wItJpumMoAA


(Labels read: "Typhon" and "Distributed by Elemental Records")








Monday, July 16, 2018

Bicycle-Self-Titled (1999)

(Art Direction/ Design by Frank Gargiulo; Photography by Dietmar Busse)

Bicycle's sole release, also called "Bicycle"- is a band/ album name combo fit to ensure that nobody in the internet age will ever be able track down anything about them EVER again. Luckily you have me to do the digging for you though, because this is good, fun stuff.

Lead singer Kurt Liebert knows his way around a catchy, summery/ sun-shiney tune. It's one of those albums that, once May or June hits, I am drawn inexorably back to. Imagine a more straightforward/ poppy Beck (including electronic flourishes and quasi-hip hop beats/ loops in places) and you'll be on the right track. I'm reminded instantly of "Cake" too (you know, the "Short Skirt, Long Jacket" guys).

Chris Ballew (yes, the Chris Ballew who sang and played bass in "The Presidents of the United States of America") has producer and backing vocal credits-so you know it's gonna be good, cheeky fun.

(Label= Capricorn Records)
 I think I will let the music do most of the talking here:

Pop Song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niVFaUbcyy0
Wilderbeast:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zw6gL6A9rmU
68:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBKvTHY6YRQ&index=1&list=PL45DDFDB812D53709
Clean:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1HWe2XLeSM&index=11&list=PL45DDFDB812D53709&t=0s




Wednesday, July 11, 2018

The Green And Yellow TV-Record X (2002)

(Photography by Shaune McDowell; Design by Jill Simonsen)
I remember discovering this album around the time iTunes became a thing (I guess I would've been a pre-teen), and I would spend a huge amount of time wandering the iTunesphere looking for good stuff. On a whim, I popped "El Cid" (ya know-the medieval Spanish warrior) into the search bar to see what would come up...and I got this nugget; a nugget I have made sure to hype to absolutely everyone I meet (fortunately it's an easy sell).

I don't know if it's true, but I read somewhere that Jimi Hendrix once sculpted his hair into a pair of antennae so that he could "tune into the sounds floating around him". Or, there's The La's (a band I cannot recommend highly enough) "Timeless Melody", which muses on songs/ melodies finding their writers. I think Record X is one of those situations: where the songs existed in a timeless ether until they fortuitously collided with The Green And Yellow TV (or perhaps entered their antennae). That's why "Record X" is such a good title. It happens in "X" time and "X" location-not quite here, not quite there. It's like the audio equivalent of a Tarantino film; it can transport you-maybe even make you feel a bit nostalgic...but for what? It's the diner scene in Pulp Fiction (or all of Pulp Fiction for that matter)-when is it happening? Is it within a self-contained alternate universe?

I wouldn't make any direct comparisons to Hendrix or the La's though-there's more of a "mod" or "British Invasion"(or maybe British Invasion through an American lens, like Paul Revere and the Raiders....or maybe even a harder-edged Beach Boys) feel here. But don't worry, this isn't one of those novelty "retro" bands...have I not written enough about the timeless ether? The songs work on their own merits, as well as the undeniable talent of the musicians involved (check out those vocal harmonies). The production also achieves 21st century clarity; the guitars are allowed to bark and foam at the mouth a little without getting lost in the mix. All of this is epitomized by (you guessed it) "El Cid". Listen below:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_-6arHObGQ

Another goody:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ2LSKCtqhE

 
(Credits same as above)
(Photography and Design by Jill Simonsen)

Monday, July 9, 2018

Uncle Green/ 3 Lb. Thrill-Rycopa (1997/ 2011) INTERVIEW WITH PETE MCDADE


So, first off, Uncle Green and 3 Lb. Thrill are the same group (the latter being a reincarnation of the former, but the former being the moniker that graces the front cover of Rycopa).

But what's in a name? That which we call 3 Lb. Thrill by any other word would sound as sweet;
So 3 Lb. Thrill, were they not 3 Lb. Thrill call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which they owe
Without that title. (My words)

Following 1995's "Vulture" the group got to work on the ambitious, kaleidoscopic double-album "Rycopa". Completed in 1997, Rycopa looked poised to ascend into the stratosphere...and it would have, had it materialized. Instead, the group's label waffled, and the album went unreleased for 14 years. Finally, in 2011, a successful Kickstarter campaign sprung the lost masterpiece from it's  bardo, purgatory, limbo, etc etc... (whatever liminal state best resonates with the reader). 
This album is extra special to me, so I thought I would take a slightly different approach to this post. To make this possible, founding Uncle Green/ 3 Lb. Thrill member, and consummate musician, Pete McDade, has very generously agreed to answer some of my questions. Here are a few tracks to play for an optimal reading experience:
St. Lazaro:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwsLuyLejEE&index=18&t=0s&list=PLEfQtN7Eu_7VHAZN2ZE0pp5ocKZSP1ifR
Wassamatta With You?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfcOau40na0&list=PLEfQtN7Eu_7VHAZN2ZE0pp5ocKZSP1ifR&index=15
Karen Dine:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVoJlo7jMVc&list=PLEfQtN7Eu_7VHAZN2ZE0pp5ocKZSP1ifR&index=1

Q: Thanks so much! I really appreciate it! Firstly, I wanted to ask you about the scope of the album--it plays almost like a "variety show" (conceptually how Sgt. Pepper's worked...or maybe The Turtles' Battle of the Bands); it's very eclectic- theatrical at times, even. And on top of that it's a double album! Was approaching the writing/ recording of this (colorful, theatrical, double) album not absolutely terrifying??! I mean, when it gets that big, it becomes a sort of grand artistic statement--you've gotta fully embrace it/ get behind it.


A: It took us 14 years to actually get it released, after finishing recording, so it's nice to have a chance to talk about it. What I remember most about the recording experience was a sense of excitement. I mean, we always loved the record-making process, but working on Rycopa was like getting to live a childhood dream. We'd been a band since we were teens, and had always dreamt of renting a house and making a record, and this was our chance to do it.

So we basically tackled a song a day. Matt, or Jeff, or Matt & Jeff (if they had written a song together), would start by playing the basic structure on piano or guitar, and then the four of us and Caram, our engineer, would start batting around ideas for arrangement and production.

Since it was just us, in this house, we really had an "anything goes" approach. We set the drums and amps up in various rooms to see what sounds we could get, rented a grand piano for the living room, and just started trying as many different approaches as we could.


By dinner we usually had the basic parts of the track in place. At night, we had any friends or guests come over to sing or play, to see what they could add.

So maybe the short answer is: we were too excited to understand we should have been a little more nervous about it all.

Q: I was reading a bit of history on the whole 3 Lb. Thrill/ Uncle Green saga, and noticed a credit on a Jesus Christ Superstar project-was going to ask if maybe Rycopa was born out of a musical theater interest- but really from what you're saying, it sounds like it wasn't a concept album in the least; you guys never sat down and said "this is what the next album is all about/ these are the types of songs we need to start writing"? Maybe that's why it feels so organic! You can point to little musical motifs and points of influence here and there...but the songs all feel really timeless. They're the types of songs that could've been written in 1968 or 2018. What advice would you give to songwriters who want to pay homage to certain musical eras or figures without ending up with a novelty record? I know "timelessness" isn't exactly a teachable concept-but is there anything from the writing/ jamming/ recording that you remember that helped keep you all in the zone?

A: Yes, you put that very well--we didn't go from the concept and then move to the songs. We started with the songs, and then the themes that tie them together emerged later.

For me, thinking about this time again has me noticing how similar the process of shaping a record and writing a novel are: I start with characters, and how they interact is what reveals the themes. In this case, the songs are the characters, and their interaction creates a mood/feeling/etc.

In short, I'm glad that Rycopa feels like a concept album.

And I agree that "timelessness" isn't something you can teach, in part because it's something I don't think you can set out trying to create. But I do think there are key elements in music that make certain songs/albums feel timeless, just as there are key elements in novels/movies/etc that can create the same effect. For music, I think melody sits at the center of it all, or at least it always did for Uncle Green. Around that center you construct the rest of the song, using dynamics and structure and arrangement. Then you finish by getting rid of all the unnecessary bits.

Does that make sense? It's almost like the first step is not trying to create the sense of timelessness. Write what you need to write, focus on making the best parts of that particular song as good as they can be, and then hope you did it right.

And then try again.

Q: I think that's hugely important. I guess I'm more from the "Myspace/ Soundcloud generation" where it's like-if you want to start a band, the first thing you do is go set up a band page and enter your genre, your key influences, and what sorts of movements/ eras you identify most with. A lot of the time that's before any songs have even been written. It's almost like step 1 is getting the marketing department up and running-identifying your key demographics...and then absolutely everything else comes afterwards. It's too easy to get carried away. So, lastly I wanted to ask--Sony was the label you were dealing with circa Rycopa? You guys had a hit as 3lb Thrill with "Diana", and then you give them two discs of fantastic material (with even more in the bank...I haven't even mentioned the outtakes album:"Scrapple"-you obviously had a lot of material to choose from; lifting a few radio singles would've been really easy)-and there's no release for 14 years? Did they ever give you any reasons as to why they weren't prepared to get behind it? 


A: I think that's an interesting ripple effect of the web I had not thought of before--young bands needing to explain and identify themselves at a very early stage, for websites/etc. Back in our day (cue old-timey music) we'd get asked about influences and sound in interviews and such, but otherwise never had to think about it that much, beyond our own private discussions.

As far as the non-release of Rycopa: yes, we were signed to 57 Records, an imprint of Sony. Calling "Diana" a hit may, alas, be a bit of a stretch--did well at radio, but not super huge, and we were told by MTV they wouldn't play the video, out of lyric(!) concerns. So our next record for Sony was actually a big make-or-break moment for us, and we went for broke.

This was either brilliant or foolish.

Sony said they didn't hear a single in the first 32 songs, which was when we went back and recorded MORE demos--the last 5 songs on Scrapple come from these sessions. Still no single, and we were dropped.

Sony did say we could have the tapes, but we were moving on, we thought, and got close to signing to MCA, before our A & R fan lost his job. Ah, the music industry. Then it took several years of searching and cajoling, before someone at Sony finally entered the right search terms and found the tapes in the ominously named "Iron Mountain" storage facility.
 
Rycopa is available for purchase on the iTunes store, but if you're like me and want a physical copy, you'll want to follow the CD Baby link below and order the disc:
https://store.cdbaby.com/cd/unclegreen2  

 

Wednesday, July 4, 2018

Oleander-Shrinking the Blob (1996/1997)

(Art direction/ design by Doug Eldridge, Paul Niklewicz; Photos by Scott Mcchane)

Oleander are perhaps a bit more well known than most of the bands I share on here. The follow up to this album (1999's February Son) was certified gold, they played Woodstock '99, and they have had some pretty high profile soundtrack credits (Dawson's Creek and American Pie to name a couple). Still, Shrinking the Blob (Oleander's sole independent release as far as I know; on Fine Records) is often unfairly overlooked.

Yes, these guys fit into the "post grunge" mold...but on Shrinking the Blob they tug a little toward the "grunge" side as opposed to the "post" side...a little. Just looking at the B-Movie inspired title may give one the impression that these guys aren't as grand and earnest as Live-nor do they have the pseudo-spiritual undertones of Creed (I genuinely enjoy both groups by the way...not taking pot-shots here)...and that impression would be correct. Check out the grit and propulsiveness of tracks like "Half an Ass", which boasts a ferocious circular riff recalling Nirvana's "Dive":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1AYwk34lVo

Unfortunately, lyrically, it sheds little to no light on the evocative title. How is the ass in question bi-sected? Vertically or horizontally? I would suggest that vertically (i.e. into two equal cheeks) makes the most sense + maintains the most tissue/ cheek integrity...but I must digress.

Here it is live, followed by another track from the album, "Jimmy Shaker Day":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1J_njRX8THo

And another rocker, "Silver Lined":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=My6mZMhca7o

So, as you can hear, this album will be an interesting case for historians and future anthropologists charting the passage of the grunge era into the post grunge era. As they pore over the shards of broken pottery, the hieroglyphics, the fossilized boom boxes, what conclusions will they reach? I am not suggesting that this album is the missing link-the change was already well underway by 1996...but this could be one of many albums released in the chasm between the two eras that really encapsulates the evolution.

Exhibit A-"Why I'm Here". The track would be cleaned up a bit and re-recorded for February Son (where it was a reasonably big hit), but the rough and ready version on Shrinking the Blob is even better. I can't find that version on Youtube, so here's a live version to give you an idea:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKNVO8QWI3U



(Art/ Design credits same as those listed under cover)